Banner for IEFV vertical bar Natalie Nanasi - Why Domestic Violence Offenders Don’t Give Up Their Guns

IEFV | Natalie Nanasi - Why Domestic Violence Offenders Don’t Give Up Their Guns

by School of Law

Academic Law Law - General Public Law - IEFV Law - Students

Fri, Mar 14, 2025

12:10 PM – 1:30 PM PDT (GMT-7)

Add to Calendar

Private Location (sign in to display)

View Map
65
Registered

Registration

Options Sales Start Sales End Availability Price
Option In-Person Registration

Sales Start - Sales End - Availability Unlimited Price FREE
Option Webinar

Sales Start - Sales End - Availability Unlimited Price FREE

Details

The UC Irvine Initiative to End Family Violence welcomes Natali Nanasi, Associate Professor at SMU Dedman School of Law and founding Director of the law school’s Judge Elmo B. Hunter Legal Center for Victims of Crimes Against Women, to present "Why Domestic Violence Offenders Don’t Give Up Their Guns."

Perpetrators of intimate partner violence are barred by federal law and many states’ laws from possessing firearms. While such prohibitions enjoy popular support, they are sporadically and inconsistently enforced, placing the lives of survivors at risk when offenders do not voluntarily comply. Many experts have offered legal and policy solutions to increase the likelihood of voluntary relinquishment or other avenues of dispossession. But these proposals may have been premature.
 
Professor Nanasi’s work takes a step back and inquires why offenders do not surrender their firearms as ordered and what might incentivize them to do so. Understanding the worldviews and lived experiences of those subject to domestic violence firearm prohibitions is a critical, and to-date ignored, first step to formulating viable solutions. Original empirical research conducted with perpetrators of intimate partner violence enrolled in a Batterer Intervention Program in Texas reveals a range of novel findings based on both survey responses and in-depth interviews. The data show that most men subject to domestic violence firearm regulations are aware that they are prohibited possessors. They are reluctant to comply with the law, however, due to the atypically high levels of violence—including gun violence—they have experienced in their lifetimes, which has led them to conclude that firearms are necessary to protect themselves and their loved ones from harm. Respondents also identify closely with a stereotypically masculine identity that leads them to associate gun ownership with power and control; have strong (but not necessarily accurate) opinions about the Second Amendment; and are enmeshed in cultures where gun-carrying is the norm.
 
These insights about the men who are impacted by domestic violence gun regulations can help us promulgate laws and policies that offenders will be more inclined to comply with and are more likely to be enforced and enforceable. And importantly, successfully removing firearms from the hands of abusers can bring us one step closer to ending the epidemic of intimate partner violence gun fatalities in the United States.

This event is approved for 1.5 hours of Minimum Continuing Legal Education Credit by the State Bar of California. UC Irvine School of Law is a State Bar-approved MCLE provider.

To request reasonable accommodations for a disability please email centers@law.uci.edu.